Register/ Login   
Submit Mobile RSS Java Script Feed  
Home Blogs Spotlight Videos Movies Cartoon Photos Submit Media Space  Feed Directory 
World |  National |  Entertainment |  General |  Columnist


Published on 21-04-2007 In National
Viewed 1600 times
Rise of the Hindu Taliban?
Written by
Amulya Ganguli
Even as the veiled women fundamentalists of a religious seminary in Islamabad are threatening video shop owners and setting a deadline for the introduction of Shariah laws in Pakistan, their Hindu counterparts in India have also become active, underlining a retrogressive tendency towards the Talibanization of the entire subcontinent.

What has angered the Hindu groups are some of the recent marriages between Hindu girls and Muslim boys. The extent of the concern among these outfits can be gauged from the fact that their chief patron, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), even brought out a compact disc depicting the supposedly baneful effects of such cross-community weddings.

Although the BJP had to withdraw the CD when the Election Commission accused it of spreading communal hatred to garner votes during the Uttar Pradesh elections, at least one saffron commentator referred to the underlying concerns expressed in the CD even as he acknowledged its crudity.


One of marriages that drew the ire of the Hindutva groups followed the elopement of a Sindhi girl of Bhopal with a Muslim boy. It led to the 'kidnapping' of the boy's brother by the police, evidently to put pressure on the groom. But when the Mumbai High Court intervened, the 'abducted' person was released.

The police were also ordered by the court to provide protection to the bride and the groom. But by then a Hindu "Kanya Suraksha Samity" (Committee to Protect the Daughters of Hindus) had been formed with the BJP's blessings.

Since Bhopal is in the BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh, incidents like the abduction of the groom's brother,  which was officially denied by the police till the man's presence in custody was filmed on a mobile phone, and the formation of the vigilante committee could take place seemingly with the tacit consent of the authorities.

But what these incidents indicate is that secular India is becoming susceptible to the kind of regressive attitudes which are associated with countries like Saudi Arabia, where there is not only a General Presidency for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, but also a so-called religious police or Muttawwa, which roams the streets looking for and punishing violations of strict Islamic laws on the segregation of the sexes. Afghanistan under the Taliban, too, had a Ministry for Fostering Virtue and Preventing Vice.

If the saffron brotherhood has set up similar organisations in India to watch over unmarried Hindu girls, the reason is the same extremist mindset based on a warped interpretation of the mutual exclusivity of religious communities, driven by an intense animosity towards the other sects.

Since this attitude has the Sangh Parivar's covert support, evident from the Vishwa Hindu Parishad's wish that the 'evil' of Muslim conspiracies shown in the banned CD should be widely disseminated, instances of attacks on Hindu-Muslim couples are likely to increase.







When the views of one such couple from Surat in Gujarat were aired over Rupert Murdoch's Star News television channel in Mumbai, the studio was attacked by a group, which called itself the Hindu Rashtriya Sena. By then, the boy and the girl had left the building and gone to the police on the advice of the  television authorities since the girl was a minor.

The new outfit has obviously modelled itself on the better known Shiv Sena, which has earned a name for itself because of its acts of hooliganism such as digging up the cricket pitches meant for India-Pakistan games or targeting couples on the occasion of Valentine's day for acting in contravention of the Sena's definition of Indian culture.

The attack on the Star News office was followed by the burning of the effigies of film stars Richard Gere and Shilpa Shetty after the Hollywood hero kissed the recent winner of the Big Brother reality show in Britain at an AIDS awareness function.

Again, the intolerance displayed by the Hindu groups (a lawyer has filed a petition in a Jaipur court against the two 'offenders' for hurting Hindu cultural sentiments) recalled the anger vented against a  woman minister in Pakistan for embracing a male companion after a paragliding show in Europe.

There is little doubt that the BJP's relentless anti-Muslim, and also anti-Christian, campaign has bred an atmosphere of intolerance in India, which frequently erupts into violence directed against individuals  with the police looking on as spectators, mainly in the BJP-ruled states.

While in the case of Christians, the focus of the Hindu extremists is usually on preventing suspected conversions, which led to the murderous assault on the missionary Graham Staines and his two sons in Orissa a few years ago, the propaganda against Muslims concentrates on their alleged links with terrorism, their preference for cow slaughter, and their suspected high rates of population growth, which threatens, according to the saffron outfits, to reduce Hindus to a minority in their 'only' country.

All these allegations, coupled with the charge that the Muslims are not sufficiently patriotic since they refuse to sing the Indian national song "Vande Mataram" (Hail to the Mother), as it includes references to Hindu idols, are continuously voiced by the BJP and other saffron groups, provoking a sense of animus  against the minorities.

IANS

 
 6 Comments    Share    Blog      Print
 

Add Your Comment

Join Indiainteracts for free to comment on this story. Have an account already? to comment
6 Comments

The usual, hackneyed psuedo-secular
nonsense that we are already tired of! I defy you to use such intemperate language against the Lashkar, Jamaat, SIMI or such outfits, in one fatwa they will finish you off. The more you selectively deride the Hindu organisations, the stronger they will emerge; people will not fall for your spurious, minority-pampering secularism anymore. Anyway, keep up the good work against Hindus!

 
sbalachandran - Comments as on 23-04-2007

Do you have the guts to appeal to your Muslim friends to remain secualr by not converting those Hindu girls to Islam after marraige? If their love for Hindu girls is so supreme, why can’t they give up Islam and embrace the religion of the girls they loved?
IF they believe in equality of all religions, why do they convert?-please enlighten us!

 
sbalachandran - Comments as on 23-04-2007

It is yet another anti-hindu oops secular article written with blatant disregard for the rules of this country and the intent is only hindu bashing.

What the author fails to acknowledge is in most of the cases the actions are illegal, though we understand the retortive action is severe, we do not have severe laws to punish such culprits.

The author is shamelessly speaking about the incident where in a muslim-hindu couple was interviewed by Rupert Murdoch’s STAR TV (trying to project Indian channels are afraid of showing such interview) and when attacked the channel asked them to go to Police as the girl was minor.

Now tell me is the marriage between a minor girl and boy legally valid. Do not say in secular weddings it is okay. This is a ploy by sections of muslim community to woo innocent adoloscent girls and marry them and convert into Islam which is what is attacked. Is it not kidnapping as per Indian Law?

The author seems to be ignorant about everything else when it comes to Hindu bashing.. Great.. His/Her comparing these incidents with Taliban shows how ignorant he/she is with wordly matters.

regards
kumar

 
kumar - Comments as on 24-04-2007

This is a timely article and well-written. Pay heed to the author’s warnings before it is too late. Those who see it merely as pseudo-secular or hindu-bashing are missing the wood for the trees. For, when the bajrang dalis and sangh parivaris go on the offensive the worst affected will be Hindus, including the very section which views secularism with suspicion and hates it.

 
casedeem - Comments as on 26-04-2007

Another anti-hindu and so called secular posting.
Why did Muslims protest to sing Vande Mataram? What happened to their secularism?
Why there were large protest for conducting mass yoga classes in MP? Is Yoga attached to hinduism?
Why are you calling LeT or SIMI as jihad instead of terrorist?
Why still there is a delay of hanging the person who was responsible for Parliament attack?
If on one side you are wooing minorities what can the majority do. Stop wooing them and treat them equally.

 
anandvg - Comments as on 27-04-2007

Please read the following article by Gurumurthy in Indian Express

Is ‘this song’ more dangerous than bombs?
————————————————–
Thursday August 24 2006 00:00 IST
S Gurumurthy

Last week the All India Muslim Personal Law Board vowed not to allow Muslim children sing the National Song ‘Vande Mataram’ as required by none other than the ‘secular’ UPA government’s most ‘secular’ Minister, Arjun Singh.

But the ALMPLB made a generous concession in favour of ‘Jana Gana Mana’ saying that Muslims had ‘no problem’ in singing the National Anthem. Soon other Islamists joined to oppose ‘Vande Mataram’. The reason: the song, which hails Bharat Mata, is against Islamic principles, they said. Vande Mataram, which so offends them, is no ordinary song but the very soul of our freedom movement. Post freedom, ‘secular’ politics had hidden the role of ‘Vande Mataram’ from most young Indians. So some recall of the history of this song is necessary.

When the Constituent Assembly discussed whether ‘Vande Mataram’ should be the National Anthem or ‘Jana Gana Mana’, Pundit Nehru described the argument as between ‘Vande Mataram’ and ‘Jana Gana Mana’ was ‘unfortunate’. He said that ‘Vande Mataram’ was ‘obviously and indisputably the premier national song of India’ with ‘a great historical tradition, and intimately connected with our struggle for freedom.’ ‘That position,’ he said, ‘it was bound to retain and no other song can displace it.’ He declared, ‘Vande Mataram will continue to be the national song par excellence.’

Muslim representatives in the Constituent Assembly agreed on this. The history of this great song dates back to the 19th century. Rabindranath Tagore first sang this song in the Calcutta Congress session of 1896. Later, in 1920s, Muslim separatists began opposing the song. Still, the Congress Working Committee, which met at Calcutta on October 26, 1937, under Nehru’s leadership, recalled that ‘the song and the words thus became the symbols national resistance to British imperialism’ and asserted that they ‘ever remind us of our struggle for national freedom’ -_note the words ‘ever remind us’. The present opposition to Vande Mataram is obviously a tragic replay of the Islamic separatist ideology that emerged in 1920s, graduated as anti-national movement in 1930s and finally led to Partition in 1940s, with the nationalist leadership compromising with separatists at every stage.

But see the frightening contrast now. The Islamist clergy sees danger to Islam in a song that was central to our freedom movement. But, horrifyingly, it sees no danger in the emergence of Islamic terror, particularly the home grown one. The clergy in Islam _ why even those claiming to be liberals among Islamists _ do not view the rise of Islamist terror as a danger to Islam. They do not see, for instance a dangerous terror out fit like the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) as a danger to Islam. Heard of a single recognised Muslim voice speaking a word against SIMI or SIMI-like Jihadi outfits mushrooming in this country?

If fatwa could be issued against Islamic children singing a patriotic song, why not issue such a one against anti-national Islamic terrorists who hurl bombs and kill innocents? If they could ban a nationalist song, why not bombs and bomb-throwing SIMIs. Why are they silent, deafeningly? The benevolent reason in their favour could only be that they are as much afraid of terror. And that they are also frightened to say that they are so afraid!

It is surprising therefore that the Islamic leadership in India is worried about the suffix ‘terror’ that has got added to Islam in public discourse. So worried, a few of them rushed to Sonia and Singh the other day, pleading that the whole Islamic community should not be linked to terror.

Little do they realise that it is not the Indian government that links Islam to terror. Terror is characterised as Islamic in global discourse. It does not need a seer to find why the world sees link between terror and Islam and why Sonias and Manmohans cannot unlink the two. First, the Islamist leadership sidesteps and escapes what should worry them more than it worries others. That is it is not just that all terrorists are, by accident, Muslims, but that terror originates in some interpretation of the Islamic faith that inspires the terrorists to turn Jihadis die and mass-kill others.

Not a single Islamic school has challenged the terror outfits for a debate on Islam, which the leaders claim as a religion of peace and which the terrorists claim as sanctioning terror, to establish that the terrorists are anti-Islamic! On the other hand, the Islamist leadership escapes facing this stark reality _ of the terrorists claiming inspiration from the Islamic faith for their acts _ by pleading that it is the Islamic tag to terror that harms Islam and Muslims, not the Islamic face of the terror itself.

Next, the world sees _ and so do most Indians _ the Islamist leaders condemning the terror but not name and condemn the terror outfits that perpetrate terror. The question is: when Islamic leaders call terror un-Islamic why can’t they name SIMI or LeT or the several Jihadi outfits as anti-Islamic. Understand why the terror tag attaches to Islam and Muslims? Sooner the Islamist leaders realise that danger to Islam comes from not such innocuous things as Vande Mataram, but from the deafening silence of the community when SIMIs and Jihadis do death dance in the name of Islam, the better for them and the country.

 
anandvg - Comments as on 27-04-2007







     

Thiruvannamalai...

Poo...

Odi polama...


Thenavattu...

A AA E EE...

Thee...

Rajni Pera Kettale ...

Rajni Pera Kettale ...

Poo Movie song 2 ...


Ashta Chemma Trail ...

Cookery Kori Barth ...

Play Movie Launch ...
     


About | Content providers | Support | Beta feedback | Report abuse | Contact us | Careers | FAQ